From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2473 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2013 19:48:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2279 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2013 19:48:49 -0000 From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/59508] std::find could use specialized container's find Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg01310.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59508 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler from comment #3) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2) > > Could you please elaborate? >=20 > My response was referring to the generic code that you provided, because > that would also be applied to user-provided specializations of library > containers and there iterator types. So it would only be feasible for a > special scenario where the library would tag its internal types and where= it > can proof that the actual predicate used is equivalent to the usage of the > associative container's predicate. Ah yes. Of course it would need to check whether the iterator type is a ty= pe of the library's standard implementation, like _Rb_tree_iterator instead= of simply checking for std::set::iterator. >>From gcc-bugs-return-437656-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Dec 15 19:58:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7740 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2013 19:58:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7702 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2013 19:58:29 -0000 From: "petr.pisar at atlas dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/58158] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with conditional moves on GPRs with a floating point conditional on mipsel with loongson2f Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: petr.pisar at atlas dot cz X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg01311.txt.bz2 Content-length: 665 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158 Petr Pisar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petr.pisar at atlas dot cz --- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar --- I still can reproduce the problem with GCC 4.8.2 if I try to compile the code from comment #1 with "gcc -O2 -march=loongson2f -mabi=n32 -Wa,-mfix-loongson2f-nop -c test2.c". Compilation with -O1 passes. I was hit by this bug when building GIMP. Though the GIMP source fails even with -O1.