From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-438058-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1618 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2013 05:20:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1586 invoked by uid 48); 19 Dec 2013 05:20:44 -0000
From: "amker.cheng at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 05:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amker.cheng at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59536-4-hZpwjNlyDw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg01713.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536

--- Comment #8 from bin.cheng <amker.cheng at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> Between r205951 and r205984.

(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to bin.cheng from comment #6)
> > Hi,
> > Sorry I don't have m68k environment to do the bootstrap, could anyone help
> > dump "-fdump-tree-all-details -fdump-rtl-all-slim" with and without the
> > patch for me?  Otherwise I have to revert the patch and hold it for future.
> > 
> 
> Can't you use cross compiler on preprocessed input to debug it?

The bare-metal tool seems not handle the preprocessed file correctly, so am
trying to build cross linux tools.  Unfortunately, cross-ng only supports
uclinux for m68k.  Given that I am not familiar with m68k-linux, so I am having
difficulty in enabling one for now.