From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440213-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23309 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2014 13:47:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23271 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jan 2014 13:47:02 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/59594] [4.9 Regression] wrong code (by tree vectorizer) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59594-4-jZ8OHQiEHd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59594-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59594-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01355.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59594

--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > It is caused by r204062.
> 
> That is only a part of the story, this testcase seems to be interesting.
> 
> Starting with r204062 until r204560 this has been broken because of an ldist
> bug.
> r204561 fixed that again and the testcase worked until r206147.
> r206148 (aka negative step vectorization support) started to ICE on this.
> With r206178 it stopped ICEing and works again with -O3 -mtune=generic, not
> sure if that has been intentional to change the generic tuning with that
> patch.  H.J.?

There was a typo in r206178 and was fixed by r206180:

http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ff385162ee38caf3100ba4a0f682241c3b0d681d

Can you try r206180 on this?

> Anyway, with -O3 -mtune=core-avx2 e.g. r206178 still ICEs and r206179 (which
> fixed the ICE) starts the miscompilation.