From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20980 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2014 13:23:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20893 invoked by uid 48); 3 Apr 2014 13:23:14 -0000 From: "kirill.yukhin at intel dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/59617] [vectorizer] ICE in vectorizable_mask_load_store with AVX-512F's gathers enabled. Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:23:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kirill.yukhin at intel dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59617 --- Comment #16 from Yukhin Kirill --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #15) > 19:02:01.000000000 +0100 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512f-gather-5.c 2014-04-03 > 15:17:05.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > /* { dg-do compile } */ > /* { dg-options "-O3 -mavx512f" } */ > +/* { dg-additional-options "-std=3Dc99" { target *-*-darwin* } } */ >=20=20 > #include "avx512f-gather-4.c" Then I think we need to add such a line in all files with __restrict keywor= d. >>From gcc-bugs-return-448197-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Apr 03 13:25:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22561 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2014 13:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22484 invoked by uid 48); 3 Apr 2014 13:25:04 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/59617] [vectorizer] ICE in vectorizable_mask_load_store with AVX-512F's gathers enabled. Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 Content-length: 496 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59617 --- Comment #17 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #14) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #13) > > Another option would be to add -std=3Dc99 for darwin. >=20 > I would suggest that this is the Right Thing to do. There is quite some usage of __restrict in gcc.target/i386/ directory. Why doesn't this problem trigger with e.g. avx2-gather-4.c, which also uses __restrict? >>From gcc-bugs-return-448198-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Apr 03 13:29:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26368 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2014 13:29:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26320 invoked by uid 48); 3 Apr 2014 13:29:21 -0000 From: "charles.baylis at linaro dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/60609] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242 Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: charles.baylis at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00218.txt.bz2 Content-length: 216 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609 --- Comment #5 from Charles Baylis --- I have proposed a fix for this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00122.html