From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-444776-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13704 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2014 13:22:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13658 invoked by uid 48); 25 Feb 2014 13:22:16 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/59626] [4.8/4.9 Regression] /usr/include/bits/unistd.h:173:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'readlinkat': recursive inlining
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:22:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-59626-4-UDXBp6aDWw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59626-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59626-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg02533.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org         |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Honza?  Does the patch make sense?  Basically the alias following breaks

int __readlinkat_alias(void) __asm__("readlinkat");
extern inline int readlinkat()
{
    return __readlinkat_alias();
}
int main() {
      return readlinkat();
}

because it replaces __readlinkat_alias () (in main) with readlinkat.