From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15192 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2014 13:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15133 invoked by uid 48); 4 Jan 2014 13:27:24 -0000 From: "Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 13:27:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59654 --- Comment #22 from tlcclt --- Success! I had to manually edit the configure file for the latest gcc to build on my Mac. (a few -Werror=3D=E2=80=A6) were blocking the compilation. Looks lik= e that should be off by default, but somehow is not. Anyway, I was able to build the gcc. And =E2=80=A6 it _fixed_ the problem i= n the real code! Thanks so much for all the assistance. >>From gcc-bugs-return-439039-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Jan 04 14:21:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2719 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2014 14:21:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2666 invoked by uid 48); 4 Jan 2014 14:21:29 -0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2 Content-length: 298 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59654 --- Comment #23 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to tlcclt from comment #22) > Anyway, I was able to build the gcc. And =E2=80=A6 it _fixed_ the problem= in the > real code! Great, thanks for checking. Will apply the backport soon. >>From gcc-bugs-return-439040-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Jan 04 16:16:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11040 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2014 16:16:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11009 invoked by uid 55); 4 Jan 2014 16:16:10 -0000 From: "christos at zoulas dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/59674] On m68k and vax variables stack variables with > MAX_STACK_ALIGNMENT make ssp fail Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 16:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: christos at zoulas dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 Content-length: 648 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59674 --- Comment #2 from Christos Zoulas --- On Jan 4, 11:20am, gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ("mikpelinux at gmail dot com") wrote: -- Subject: [Bug c/59674] On m68k and vax variables stack variables with > MA | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59674 | | --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson --- | Works, as in generates OK looking code w/o issuing any diagnostics, on both | m68k-linux and vax-linux for me. A NetBSD issue? Are you using a native compiler or a cross-compiler? We are using a cross compiler from amd64. christos