From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-439053-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2755 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2014 18:54:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2693 invoked by uid 48); 4 Jan 2014 18:54:42 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 18:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59654-4-GLEz6Yz8ZH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654

--- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Why doesn't anyone report this issue? It's now tracked as PR59663

It has been pr59541 since 2013-12-18 07:46 UTC.