public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:01:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-59654-4-OqTPJRs74g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-59654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[OOP] Broken function table |[4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] |with complex OO use case |Broken function table with | |complex OO use case --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm marking this PR as a regression, due to the fact that both comment 9 and comment 11 work with 4.7, but fail with 4.8 upwards. However, I'm not sure if 4.7 works reliably or if it is just a coincidence due to the Heisenbuggy nature of this bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-02 14:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-01-01 1:25 [Bug fortran/59654] New: " Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov 2014-01-01 1:27 ` [Bug fortran/59654] " Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov 2014-01-01 4:02 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-01 4:27 ` Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov 2014-01-01 4:53 ` Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov 2014-01-01 13:40 ` [Bug fortran/59654] [OOP] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-01 14:13 ` Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov 2014-01-01 23:25 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-02 9:57 ` anlauf at gmx dot de 2014-01-02 11:08 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-02 12:43 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-02 13:51 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-02 14:01 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2014-01-02 16:15 ` [Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-02 17:27 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-02 17:56 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-02 20:51 ` Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov 2014-01-02 21:59 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-02 23:51 ` rouson at stanford dot edu 2014-01-03 9:15 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-04 13:27 ` Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov 2014-01-04 16:47 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-04 16:51 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-04 18:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-59654-4-OqTPJRs74g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).