From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27945 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2014 14:01:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27872 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jan 2014 14:01:03 -0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[OOP] Broken function table |[4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] |with complex OO use case |Broken function table with | |complex OO use case --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm marking this PR as a regression, due to the fact that both comment 9 and comment 11 work with 4.7, but fail with 4.8 upwards. However, I'm not sure if 4.7 works reliably or if it is just a coincidence due to the Heisenbuggy nature of this bug.