From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31724 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2014 17:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31672 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jan 2014 17:12:02 -0000 From: "martin at netbsd dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/59674] On m68k and vax variables stack variables with > MAX_STACK_ALIGNMENT make ssp fail Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:12:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: martin at netbsd dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg02477.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59674 Martin Husemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin at netbsd dot org --- Comment #8 from Martin Husemann --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #7) > If you have fundamental types with stricter alignment requirements than > provided by STACK_BOUNDARY your ABI has a problem, and this SSP failure is > just one symptom. Why is that a fundamental problem? It is not that different to i386 and data used for MMX/SSE instructions - "not nice", but the compiler should be able to cope.