From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4631 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2014 22:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4584 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jan 2014 22:29:25 -0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 22:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01198.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I agree with Jerry that the errors with logical can be fixed later (AFAICT they are not a regression up to 4.3.1). I also think the error read(fd, *, err=31, iomsg=msg) i1, x2, a, x1 31 if (msg /= 'Bad repeat count in item 3 of list input') call abort is bogus (IIRC repeat count needs a '*').