From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32328 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2014 23:24:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32293 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jan 2014 23:24:08 -0000 From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59700 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > r203000 (2013-09-27) gives >=20 > At line 7 of file pr59700.f90 > Fortran runtime error: Bad integer for item 4 in list input >=20 > while r203129 (2013-10-02) gives 'item 0'. It is likely r203086 for trunk > and r203201 for 4.8.2. >=20 > I think this due to >=20 > + > + free_line (dtp); > snprintf (message, MSGLEN, "Bad integer for item %d in list input", > dtp->u.p.item_count); yep. free_line() explicitly set dtp->u.p.item_count =3D 0. It appears that the two lines are inverted. I'm testing a fix now. >>From gcc-bugs-return-439446-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jan 06 23:29:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3279 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2014 23:29:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3246 invoked by uid 55); 6 Jan 2014 23:29:43 -0000 From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00588.txt.bz2 Content-length: 213 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- The attached patch fixes the code in comment #1. I'm currently doing the regtest.