From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-444570-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32162 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2014 00:34:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32110 invoked by uid 55); 22 Feb 2014 00:34:05 -0000
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 00:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59700-4-RchKw2Yuiq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59700-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59700-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg02327.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700

--- Comment #23 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:02:38AM +0000, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
> 
> --- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Fixed on trunk. Do I need to backport this?
> 

IMHO, No.