From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31434 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2014 12:33:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31343 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jan 2014 12:32:59 -0000 From: "josh at joshtriplett dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/59708] clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: josh at joshtriplett dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00652.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708 --- Comment #4 from Josh Triplett --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Not sure I like their naming though, I'd say they should be type generic > builtins handled in the FEs depending on the first argument's type, so that > it works even for say __int128_t and similar. I'd like to have builtins compatible with the clang versions, but adding a set of type-generic versions sounds like a great idea as well.