From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1724 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2014 22:52:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1675 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jan 2014 22:52:42 -0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/59723] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_tree, at lto-streamer-out.c:1390 when compiling some Fortran tests with -flto Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01015.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > ... which implies that the GCC testsuite needs to be improved with regards > to LTO testing as there was no new failure with the patch. Not GCC, but gfortran. I stumbled on this pr with make -k check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32/-flto,-m64/-flto}'" One may consider to add something '-Ofast -flto' to the set of options in gfortran.dg.