[Bug c/59753] -Woverflow warning inconsistency with signed constant conversion between T_MAX+1 and UT_MAX vs larger than UT_MAX

["manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59753

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #4)
> There's still an inconsistency without -Wpedantic, which is the point of
> this bug. I've changed the bug title to:
> 
>   -Woverflow warning inconsistency with signed constant conversion between
> T_MAX+1 and UT_MAX vs larger than UT_MAX

I seem to remember this inconsistency is due to the exact definition of
overflow given in the standard. But I agree that this is confusing for the rest
of humanity who don't know the standard by heart. Also, the warnings would be
useful by default since they are likely mistakes.

> If this inconsistency is intentional, then it should be documented. The
> current behavior doesn't match the documentation:

Agreed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-442706-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 05 16:47:56 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-442706-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26926 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2014 16:47:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26884 invoked by uid 48); 5 Feb 2014 16:47:53 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/59737] [4.9 Regression] ice from optimize_inline_calls
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-59737-4-PL7u2r72Lp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59737-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59737-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00463.txt.bz2
Content-length: 406

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idY737

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r206042.