From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440055-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1470 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2014 22:26:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1170 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jan 2014 22:26:23 -0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/59765] [4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with allocatable component
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 22:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59765-4-FlLKDjlB4y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59765-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59765-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01197.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765

--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> > I'm pretty sure this is my fault. I'd bet for r206379.
> 
> r206362 is OK, r206444 is not.

... and indeed reverting r206379 makes the ICE go away. However I don't think
there is anything wrong with that revision. It probably just exposed a lower
lying problem.