From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-443293-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2362 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2014 14:37:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2314 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2014 14:37:17 -0000
From: "rth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/59776] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc -g -O1 ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3865
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59776-4-SN8WXmmw6S@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59776-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59776-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01050.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59776

--- Comment #10 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> So, do we want to do this instead?  In this particular case, even no
> DW_OP_GNU_reinterpret is needed.

Well, except for the whole dhrs = NULL_TREE thing on the previous line.
Either we need a check for that on the IF, or that line really needs to
be a gcc_unreachable.