From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16256 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2014 17:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16198 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2014 17:19:44 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/59807] mutex misses destructor if non-function call initialization is used Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01482.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59807 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- It a target's pthread_mutex requires cleanup then it should not define __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT, it should use the init function, and then it gets a chance to also run a destroy function. That can be controlled by defining _GTHREAD_USE_MUTEX_INIT_FUNC in the relevant libstdc++-v3/config/os/xxx/os_defines.h header.