* [Bug target/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors)
[not found] <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-01-14 15:59 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-01-14 19:35 ` [Bug testsuite/59808] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2014-01-14 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59808
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-01-14
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors)
[not found] <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-01-14 15:59 ` [Bug target/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors) hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2014-01-14 19:35 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2014-01-15 8:23 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2014-01-14 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59808
Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|target |testsuite
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Somebody forgot to update gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c, in the same way as sse-22.c
[1].
[1]
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sse-22.c?limit_changes=0&r1=206596&r2=206595&pathrev=206596
>From gcc-bugs-return-440349-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jan 14 19:37:38 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440349-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21228 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2014 19:37:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20991 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2014 19:37:35 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59808-4-yBtAp2d11X@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01491.txt.bz2
Content-length: 176
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59808
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Kirill, please update also sse-13.c with new builtins.
>From gcc-bugs-return-440350-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jan 14 19:38:58 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440350-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26249 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2014 19:38:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25869 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2014 19:38:53 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59808-4-po0r7fagLI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01492.txt.bz2
Content-length: 257
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59808
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> Kirill, please update also sse-13.c with new builtins.
And sse-12.c with new options.
>From gcc-bugs-return-440351-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jan 14 19:51:33 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440351-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1440 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2014 19:51:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1373 invoked by uid 55); 14 Jan 2014 19:51:28 -0000
From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/28865] Structures with a flexible arrray member have wrong .size
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-28865-4-WQTpZG8QAP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01493.txt.bz2
Content-length: 713
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id(865
--- Comment #25 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> But the glibc headers case you're mentioning wasn't initializing the flexible
> array members, right? (Or even initialization with {} initializer is fine I
I don't have details of exactly what uses of flexible array members they
were making beyond those permitted by ISO C. I guess the general point is
to be careful about disallowing such uses because it might break existing
code (so allowing plenty of time before a release for distribution
rebuilds to catch any problems with such a change, for example).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors)
[not found] <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-01-14 15:59 ` [Bug target/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors) hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-01-14 19:35 ` [Bug testsuite/59808] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2014-01-15 8:23 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2014-01-15 12:01 ` kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2014-01-15 8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59808
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Yukhin Kirill from comment #5)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> > > Kirill, please update also sse-13.c with new builtins.
> >
> > And sse-12.c with new options.
>
> Sure, I think this is obvious change if no regressions.
> Will do today.
Yes, I'd rather see this change with relevant part of Comment #4 together.
The combined patch is pre-approved, after it is tested correctly.
>From gcc-bugs-return-440393-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 15 08:27:53 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440393-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30655 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2014 08:27:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30418 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2014 08:27:49 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/58943] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong calculation of indirect structure member arithmetic via function call
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-58943-4-mRVi1KYJR5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01535.txt.bz2
Content-length: 660
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX943
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] |[4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong
|wrong calculation of |calculation of indirect
|indirect structure member |structure member arithmetic
|arithmetic via function |via function call
|call |
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 4.9+.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors)
[not found] <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-15 8:23 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2014-01-15 12:01 ` kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-15 12:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-16 4:25 ` kirill.yukhin at intel dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-15 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59808
--- Comment #7 from Kirill Yukhin <kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed Jan 15 12:01:08 2014
New Revision: 206629
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59808
* gcc.target/i386/sse-12.c: Add `-mavx512[cd, er, pf]' options.
* gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c: Fix PR59808.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sse-12.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors)
[not found] <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-15 12:01 ` kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-15 12:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-16 4:25 ` kirill.yukhin at intel dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-15 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59808
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/59808] [4.9 Regression] r206596 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c (test for excess errors)
[not found] <bug-59808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-15 12:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-16 4:25 ` kirill.yukhin at intel dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kirill.yukhin at intel dot com @ 2014-01-16 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59808
--- Comment #11 from Yukhin Kirill <kirill.yukhin at intel dot com> ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
>
> > This is not a good ChangeLog entry. You should say somethin along
> >
> > * gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c: Update constant avx512erintrin.h tests.
>
> * gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c: Update constants for avx512erintrin.h tests.
Agree, not good. Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-440505-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 16 05:26:17 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440505-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30904 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2014 05:26:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30883 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2014 05:26:12 -0000
From: "zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/59837] New: [ARM] ICE when building linux-linaro-tracking
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 05:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-59837-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01647.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1259
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59837
Bug ID: 59837
Summary: [ARM] ICE when building linux-linaro-tracking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org
Created attachment 31849
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31849&action=edit
testcase
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc neon.c -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mapcs
-mabi=aapcs-linux -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon -g -S -marm
neon.c: In function ‘raid6_neon4_gen_syndrome_real’:
neon.c:79:1: internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa, at
dwarf2cfi.c:1090
Root cause:
When expanding epilogue, REG_CFA_ADJUST_CFA NOTE is added to handle dwarf info
issue for shrink-wrap. But for TARGET_APCS_FRAME, shrink-wrap is disabled. And
not all dwarf info in arm_expand_epilogue_apcs_frame are correctly updated.
arm_emit_vfp_multi_reg_pop is called by both arm_expand_epilogue_apcs_frame and
arm_expand_epilogue. So we should not add the NOTE in
arm_emit_vfp_multi_reg_pop if shrink-wrap is not enabled.
>From gcc-bugs-return-440506-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 16 05:44:55 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440506-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1445 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2014 05:44:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1072 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2014 05:44:51 -0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 05:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority cc
Message-ID: <bug-58996-4-LxAqEtGZt1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58996-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58996-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01648.txt.bz2
Content-length: 774
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX996
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P1 |P4
CC| |law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
I hacked up a RHL 8 system far enough to try and build os-unix.c. I can
confirm that I got the error in this bug report and that it compiled
successfully after your patch Balaji.
Other issues get in the way of doing a full build/test, but RHL8 is so old that
we should commit and move on :-) I certainly don't believe this should be a P1
regression.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread