From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440420-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31961 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2014 11:47:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31941 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2014 11:47:23 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/59821] __builtin_LINE and __builtin_FILE for new'd objects is wrong
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-59821-4-fQouKdsd5S@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01562.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-debug
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-01-15
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
    [t.C : 12:3] Foo::Foo ([t.C : 12] &D.2242, 12);
    [t.C : 12:42] try
      {
        [t.C : 12:3] D.2247 = D.2242.line;
        [t.C : 12:3] D.2244 = 5;
        [t.C : 12:3] D.2243 = operator new (4);
        [t.C : 12:3] try
          {
            [t.C : 12:3] Foo::Foo (D.2243, D.2244);

looks like location info is broken for the new case.