From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20134 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2014 17:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20085 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2014 17:10:12 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/59821] __builtin_LINE and __builtin_FILE for new'd objects is wrong Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01725.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- While I agree with that, for _builtin_{LINE,FILE,FUNCTION} (), those were added specifically for the use in default arguments and were I think from the start meant to give you the location of the call, not of the token where it appears, otherwise those builtins don't make much sense (you could use __LINE__, __FILE__ or __FUNCTION__ instead).