public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/59825] New: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures
@ 2014-01-15 12:10 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-01-15 13:32 ` [Bug c/59825] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2014-01-15 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
Bug ID: 59825
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
On Linux/x86, revision 206621 gave:
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus -g -O0 -std=c99
(internal compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus -g -O0 -std=c99
(test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus (internal compiler
error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus -O2 -std=c99
(internal compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus -O2 -std=c99 (test
for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus -O3 -std=c99
(internal compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus -O3 -std=c99 (test
for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus -std=c99 (internal
compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus -std=c99 (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -fcilkplus (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -g -fcilkplus (internal
compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -g -fcilkplus (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize
-fcilkplus (internal compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize
-fcilkplus (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -O1 -fcilkplus (internal
compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -O1 -fcilkplus (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -O2 -fcilkplus (internal
compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -O2 -fcilkplus (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -O3 -fcilkplus (internal
compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/rank_mismatch2.c -O3 -fcilkplus (test for
excess errors)
Revision 206615 is OK.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c/59825] [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures
2014-01-15 12:10 [Bug c/59825] New: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2014-01-15 13:32 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-01-15 13:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2014-01-15 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-01-15
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
It is caused by r206620.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c/59825] [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures
2014-01-15 12:10 [Bug c/59825] New: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-01-15 13:32 ` [Bug c/59825] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2014-01-15 13:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-16 19:49 ` [Bug c/59825] " law at redhat dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-15 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That is known, I've said that explicitly in the patch submission that AN is
broken and will need to be fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c/59825] Many cilkplus test failures
2014-01-15 12:10 [Bug c/59825] New: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-01-15 13:32 ` [Bug c/59825] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-01-15 13:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-16 19:49 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-01-17 21:18 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2014-01-16 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bviyer at gmail dot com
Summary|[4.9 Regression] Many |Many cilkplus test failures
|cilkplus test failures |
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Given Cilk+ is new in 4.9 the test failures are not a regression.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c/59825] Many cilkplus test failures
2014-01-15 12:10 [Bug c/59825] New: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-16 19:49 ` [Bug c/59825] " law at redhat dot com
@ 2014-01-17 21:18 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-17 21:19 ` law at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-17 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3)
> Given Cilk+ is new in 4.9 the test failures are not a regression.
Meh, I see you subscribe to the release-maintainer-definition; still they
passed before, so it's a regression on trunk, even if not compared to a
release.
(An autotester doesn't care whether the reason they passed is right or wrong,
it just keeps shouting at me...) Anyway, apparently all targets see this, pain
dutily shared. Thanks to H.J. for the PR.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c/59825] Many cilkplus test failures
2014-01-15 12:10 [Bug c/59825] New: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-17 21:18 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-17 21:19 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-01-23 17:01 ` bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-24 21:03 ` law at redhat dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2014-01-17 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
It's certainly my mindset right now.. But fully understand the complaints
you're getting from the autotester :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c/59825] Many cilkplus test failures
2014-01-15 12:10 [Bug c/59825] New: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-17 21:19 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2014-01-23 17:01 ` bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-24 21:03 ` law at redhat dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-01-23 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
--- Comment #6 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bviyer
Date: Thu Jan 23 17:00:53 2014
New Revision: 206991
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR c/59825.
2014-01-23 Balaji V. Iyer <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>
PR c/59825
* c-array-notation.c (expand_array_notation_exprs): Rewrote this
function to use walk_tree and moved a lot of its functionality to
expand_array_notations.
(expand_array_notations): New function.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c/c-array-notation.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug c/59825] Many cilkplus test failures
2014-01-15 12:10 [Bug c/59825] New: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-23 17:01 ` bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-24 21:03 ` law at redhat dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2014-01-24 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Should be resolved by Balaji's trunk commit.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-24 21:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-15 12:10 [Bug c/59825] New: [4.9 Regression] Many cilkplus test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-01-15 13:32 ` [Bug c/59825] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2014-01-15 13:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-16 19:49 ` [Bug c/59825] " law at redhat dot com
2014-01-17 21:18 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-17 21:19 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-01-23 17:01 ` bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-24 21:03 ` law at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).