From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9008 invoked by alias); 8 May 2014 17:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8962 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2014 17:20:31 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 17:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00712.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59952 --- Comment #18 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17) > I'm not sure about that, after all we enable PTA_HLE even for generic. > The point is whether it might be beneficial to emit the HLE prefixes or n= ot, > on CPUs that never have HLE obviously it doesn't make sense, on CPUs that > sometimes or always have it it makes sense. Ah, you are right. PTA_HLE is benign. It is emitted as a prefix, and is ign= ored on non-HLE CPUs. >>From gcc-bugs-return-451021-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu May 08 17:23:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11751 invoked by alias); 8 May 2014 17:23:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11704 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2014 17:23:37 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13868] Conditional expression operator and implicit char array conversion Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 17:23:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 3.3.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution target_milestone cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00713.txt.bz2 Content-length: 628 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13868 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 Known to fail| | --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- This works with GCC 4.7 and above.