From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-451018-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6828 invoked by alias); 8 May 2014 17:18:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6772 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2014 17:18:30 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/59952] -march=core-avx2 should not enable RTM
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 17:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59952-4-dad5H8Asvi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00710.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59952

--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm not sure about that, after all we enable PTA_HLE even for generic.
The point is whether it might be beneficial to emit the HLE prefixes or not, on
CPUs that never have HLE obviously it doesn't make sense, on CPUs that
sometimes or always have it it makes sense.