From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-441820-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26875 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2014 23:33:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26717 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jan 2014 23:33:09 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/59974] ostream crashes on large numbers under Windows
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59974-4-L1Vu1VlWFM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59974-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59974-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg02962.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59974

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
C99 says they return the number of characters that would have been written for
the return value of snprintf.  Now older versions of glibc (2.0.6) are broken
the same way mingw is broken.