public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/60029] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test
@ 2014-02-02 15:11 schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-02 15:12 ` [Bug target/60029] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-02-02 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60029
Bug ID: 60029
Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c
-std=c++11 execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: schwab@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc-*-*
$ gcc/xg++ -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -nostdinc++
-Ipowerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc64-linux
-Ipowerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/include -I../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I../libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I../libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util
-fmessage-length=0 -std=c++11 -Lpowerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-Bpowerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-Lpowerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -lm -m32 -o ./convert-bfp.exe
$
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:powerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:powerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:gcc:gcc/32:.:powerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:powerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:gcc:gcc/32:powerpc64-linux/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:powerpc64-linux/libsanitizer/.libs:powerpc64-linux/libssp/.libs:powerpc64-linux/libgomp/.libs:powerpc64-linux/libitm/.libs:powerpc64-linux/libatomic/.libs:./gcc:./prev-gcc
./convert-bfp.exe
Segmentation fault
>From convert-bfp.c.214r.reload:
(insn 666 665 316 30 (set (reg:DD 8 8)
(mem/c:DD (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 31 31)
(const_int 24 [0x18])) [0 S8 A64]))
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c:85 445 {*movdd_hardfloat32}
(nil))
(insn 316 666 317 30 (set (mem/v/c:SD (lo_sum:SI (reg:SI 9 9 [346])
(symbol_ref:SI ("d32") [flags 0x6] <var_decl 0x3fff89f17be0
d32>)) [0 d32+0 S4 A32])
(reg:SD 8 8)) gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c:85 441
{movsd_hardfloat}
(nil))
With -m32 insn 666 is split into two insns that clobber both register 8 and 9.
(insn 754 665 755 (set (reg:SI 8 8)
(mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 31 31)
(const_int 24 [0x18])) [0 S4 A64]))
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c:85 434 {*movsi_internal1}
(nil))
(insn 755 754 316 (set (reg:SI 9 9 [orig:8+4 ] [8])
(mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 31 31)
(const_int 28 [0x1c])) [0 S4 A32]))
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c:85 434 {*movsi_internal1}
(nil))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/60029] [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test
2014-02-02 15:11 [Bug target/60029] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-02-02 15:12 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-03 9:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-10 1:31 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-02-02 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60029
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/60029] [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test
2014-02-02 15:11 [Bug target/60029] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-02 15:12 ` [Bug target/60029] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-02-03 9:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-10 1:31 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-03 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60029
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/60029] [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test
2014-02-02 15:11 [Bug target/60029] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-02 15:12 ` [Bug target/60029] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-03 9:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-10 1:31 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: amodra at gmail dot com @ 2014-02-10 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60029
Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |amodra at gmail dot com
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
Fixed by r207553. I'm not sure why this one didn't show up in the list of
tests I reported fixed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00273.html, and I've blown away
that build directory.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60032 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-10 1:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-02 15:11 [Bug target/60029] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-02 15:12 ` [Bug target/60029] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-02-03 9:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-10 1:31 ` amodra at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).