From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29309 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2014 16:00:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29273 invoked by uid 48); 16 Apr 2014 16:00:20 -0000 From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/60050] Build failure on MinGW64 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg01199.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60050 --- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz --- we took care that gcc's abort-redefinition doesn't break the platform-internal use. For further information take a look to mingw-w64's headers. This is the wrong place to discuss that.