public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/60077] [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs
  2014-02-05 13:50 [Bug target/60077] New: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-05 13:50 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-05 14:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-05 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60077

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.9.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/60077] New: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs
@ 2014-02-05 13:50 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-05 13:50 ` [Bug target/60077] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-05 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60077

            Bug ID: 60077
           Summary: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
              Host: i386-pc-solaris2.*, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
                    x86_64-unknown-darwin*
            Target: i386-pc-solaris2.*, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
                    x86_64-unknown-darwin*
             Build: i386-pc-solaris2.*, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
                    x86_64-unknown-darwin*

Since ca. 20140124, the following testcase FAILs everywhere:

FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c scan-assembler-not movups

This is a regression from 4.8.

  Rainer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/60077] [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs
  2014-02-05 13:50 [Bug target/60077] New: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-05 13:50 ` [Bug target/60077] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-05 14:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-06  9:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-05 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60077

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-02-05
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/60077] [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs
  2014-02-05 13:50 [Bug target/60077] New: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-05 13:50 ` [Bug target/60077] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-05 14:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-06  9:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-06 10:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-06  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60077

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r206947.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/60077] [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs
  2014-02-05 13:50 [Bug target/60077] New: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-02-06  9:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-06 10:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-07  2:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-06 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60077

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 32063
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32063&action=edit
gcc49-pr60077.patch

Untested fix.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/60077] [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs
  2014-02-05 13:50 [Bug target/60077] New: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-02-06 10:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-07  2:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-07  2:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-07 23:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-07  2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60077

Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/60077] [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs
  2014-02-05 13:50 [Bug target/60077] New: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-02-07  2:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-07  2:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-07 23:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-07  2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60077

--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Feb  7 02:11:27 2014
New Revision: 207587

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207587&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:

    PR target/60077
    * expr.c (emit_move_resolve_push): Export; be bit more selective
    on when to clear alias set.
    * expr.h (emit_move_resolve_push): Declare.
    * function.h (struct function): Add tail_call_marked.
    * tree-tailcall.c (optimize_tail_call): Set tail_call_marked.
    * config/i386/i386-protos.h (ix86_expand_push): Remove.
    * config/i386/i386.md (TImode move expander): De not call
    ix86_expand_push.
    (FP push expanders): Preserve memory attributes.
    * config/i386/sse.md (push<mode>1): Remove.
    * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_vector_move): Handle push
    operation.
    (ix86_expand_push): Remove.
    * config/i386/mmx.md (push<mode>1): Remove.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386-protos.h
    trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
    trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
    trunk/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md
    trunk/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
    trunk/gcc/expr.c
    trunk/gcc/expr.h
    trunk/gcc/function.h
    trunk/gcc/tree-tailcall.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/60077] [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs
  2014-02-05 13:50 [Bug target/60077] New: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-02-07  2:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-07 23:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-07 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60077

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb  7 23:55:24 2014
New Revision: 207622

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207622&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
    PR target/60077
    * gcc.target/i386/pr60077-1.c: New test.
    * gcc.target/i386/pr60077-2.c: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr60077-1.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr60077-2.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-07 23:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-05 13:50 [Bug target/60077] New: [4.9 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr35767-5.c FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-05 13:50 ` [Bug target/60077] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-05 14:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06  9:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 10:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-07  2:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-07  2:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-07 23:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).