public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/60092] posix_memalign not recognized to derive alias and alignment info
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-60092-4-9Q8mGdISTg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-60092-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60092

--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> As the standard doesn't specify that the value is undefined upon error and it
> only specifies its contents upon successfull completion it implicitely says
> that it retains the previous value on error.
>
> I'd say xfail/skip this on solaris11 and report a bug to them.

Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01039.html

I'd already reported the bug:

    18253126 posix_memalign writes to first arg on error

    Rainer


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-18 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-06 10:22 [Bug middle-end/60092] New: " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 10:22 ` [Bug middle-end/60092] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 10:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 11:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 12:51 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 13:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 13:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 13:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 14:07 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2014-02-06 14:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 14:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 14:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-06 15:03 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2014-02-07  9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-07 13:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-12 10:01 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-12 10:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-12 13:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-14 16:11 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-14 16:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-14 16:40 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2014-02-15  9:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-18 14:52 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE [this message]
2014-04-22 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-28 14:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-03 13:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-60092-4-9Q8mGdISTg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).