From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10704 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2014 13:17:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10335 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2014 13:17:13 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/60101] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Long compile times when mixed complex floating point datatypes are used in lengthy expressions Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01036.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D60101 --- Comment #11 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- Sorry for not being more helpful, it was a long time ago that I worked on t= hat. Perhaps if you tell me which revision did the reversal/implemented the special-handling of SAVE_EXPR, I can figure out what is going on. >>From gcc-bugs-return-443280-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 11 13:29:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19091 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2014 13:29:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19077 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2014 13:29:10 -0000 From: "loximann at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/60144] New: Misleading error message when missing "then" after "if" and "else if" Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: loximann at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01037.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1077 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60144 Bug ID: 60144 Summary: Misleading error message when missing "then" after "if" and "else if" Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: loximann at gmail dot com Compiler version: GNU Fortran (Ubuntu 20130917-1ubuntu1) 4.9.0 20130917 (experimental) [trunk revision 202647] Test program: -------------------- program ifelif if (.TRUE.) else if (.FALSE.) end if end program -------------------- Error messages: ---------------------- if.F90:2.15: if (.TRUE.) 1 Error: Cannot assign to a named constant at (1) if.F90:3.11: else if (.FALSE.) 1 Error: Unexpected junk after ELSE statement at (1) [...] ---------------------- Both errors should read something like "Missing THEN after IF/ELSE IF". The first error message doesn't even make sense...