public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60108] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [C++11] ICE in use_thunk, at cp/method.c:340
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 23:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-60108-4-NjKed9FuNJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-60108-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60108

Volker Reichelt <reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
      Known to work|                            |4.4.0, 4.5.0, 4.6.0
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-02-14
                 CC|                            |reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
            Summary|ICE in use_thunk, at        |[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]
                   |cp/method.c:340             |[C++11] ICE in use_thunk,
                   |                            |at cp/method.c:340
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.7.4
      Known to fail|                            |4.7.0

--- Comment #1 from Volker Reichelt <reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. ICEs since GCC 4.7.0.

Here's a testcase without variadic templates:

============================================
template<int> struct A
{
  virtual ~A();
};

template<typename> struct B : A<0>, A<1>
{
  ~B() = default;
};

struct C : B<bool>
{
  C() {}
};
============================================


  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-14 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-07 16:17 [Bug c++/60108] New: " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-14 23:35 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-02-21 21:58 ` [Bug c++/60108] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [C++11] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-21 22:15 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-22  5:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-60108-4-NjKed9FuNJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).