public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/60121] gcc does not warn an obvious out-of-bound array access at -O0 and -O1 Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 06:39:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-60121-4-gJGFpCsQml@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-60121-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60121 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- No. VRP isn't really a cheap pass and for -O0 the most important thing is compile time speed. GCC has never guaranteed the same warnings between optimization levels, for frontend warnings it is sometimes possible to have the same warnings, but for middle-end warnings it is not possible and never a goal. Think say about uninitialized warnings, some of them heavily depend on which functions are inlined and which are not.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-09 6:39 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-02-08 23:15 [Bug c/60121] New: " su at cs dot ucdavis.edu 2014-02-08 23:41 ` [Bug middle-end/60121] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-09 0:08 ` su at cs dot ucdavis.edu 2014-02-09 0:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-09 0:18 ` su at cs dot ucdavis.edu 2014-02-09 0:32 ` chengniansun at gmail dot com 2014-02-09 0:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-09 1:27 ` chengniansun at gmail dot com 2014-02-09 6:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-60121-4-gJGFpCsQml@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).