From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27566 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2014 16:04:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27532 invoked by uid 55); 27 Mar 2014 16:04:02 -0000 From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/60128] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong ouput using en edit descriptor Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dave.anglin at bell dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg02517.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128 --- Comment #55 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 3/27/2014 11:00 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > Could you test the following code? Here is output: Unsupported rounding for real(4) Unsupported rounding for real(8) (en15.2) 98.77E+03 expected: 98.76E+03 (en15.2) -98.77E+03 expected: -98.76E+03 8 2 Program aborted. Backtrace: ** Something went wrong while running addr2line. ** ** Falling back to a simpler backtrace scheme. ** #1 c00000000033b5bf FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_en_1.f90 -O0 execution test XPASS: gfortran.dg/fmt_en_1.f90 -O0 scan-file-not Unsupported rounding So, probably abort shouldn't be called when rounding isn't supported. I would change "hpux11*" to "hpux*".