public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/60172] ARM performance regression from trunk@207239 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:03:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-60172-4-7FlnFDwTaH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-60172-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60172 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note that we can probably avoid regressing TER by removing the dead stmt in forwprop itself (which would be appropriate at this stage). But as that doesn't help this still needs more analysis.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 14:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-02-13 9:54 [Bug tree-optimization/60172] New: " joey.ye at arm dot com 2014-02-14 8:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/60172] " joey.ye at arm dot com 2014-02-14 10:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-14 10:50 ` joey.ye at arm dot com 2014-02-14 12:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-14 14:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2014-02-17 9:56 ` joey.ye at arm dot com 2014-02-17 10:07 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-02-19 11:19 ` joey.ye at arm dot com 2014-02-19 11:21 ` joey.ye at arm dot com 2014-02-19 23:06 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-20 10:02 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-04-14 7:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/60172] [4.9/4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-05-09 8:51 ` thomas.preudhomme at arm dot com 2014-05-15 3:29 ` thomas.preudhomme at arm dot com 2014-05-15 8:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-05-15 8:54 ` thomas.preudhomme at arm dot com 2014-05-15 9:51 ` thomas.preudhomme at arm dot com 2014-05-15 10:12 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2014-06-18 14:21 ` bpringlemeir at gmail dot com 2014-06-18 15:15 ` bpringlemeir at gmail dot com 2014-07-16 13:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-10-30 10:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/60172] [4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-13 14:55 ` joey.ye at arm dot com 2015-06-26 19:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/60172] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-60172-4-7FlnFDwTaH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).