From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13866 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2014 22:56:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13843 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2014 22:56:29 -0000 From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/60187] New: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with parameter pack as underlying type for enum Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01270.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60187 Bug ID: 60187 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with parameter pack as underlying type for enum Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org The following invalid code snippet (compiled with "-std=c++11") triggers an ICE since GCC 4.6.0: ================================================== template struct A { enum E : T {}; }; A a; ================================================== bug.cc: In instantiation of 'struct A': bug.cc:6:8: required from here bug.cc:3:8: internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:20283 enum E : T {}; ^ 0x5ff408 dependent_type_p(tree_node*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:20283 0x5d1e29 start_enum(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, bool, bool*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c:12604 0x624e54 lookup_template_class_1 ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:7518 0x624e54 lookup_template_class(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, int, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:7725 0x629673 tsubst_aggr_type ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:10031 0x61b9f1 tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:11436 0x62e0d3 tsubst_decl ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:10824 0x61be9f tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:11357 0x64a34a instantiate_class_template_1 ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:9010 0x64a34a instantiate_class_template(tree_node*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:9274 0x6db973 complete_type(tree_node*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/typeck.c:134 0x5c4f38 start_decl_1(tree_node*, bool) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c:4719 0x5ede67 start_decl(cp_declarator const*, cp_decl_specifier_seq*, int, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node**) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c:4682 0x6c7e9e cp_parser_init_declarator ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:16680 0x6c9929 cp_parser_simple_declaration ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:11205 0x6acc13 cp_parser_block_declaration ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:11086 0x6d3ec2 cp_parser_declaration ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10983 0x6d2bb8 cp_parser_declaration_seq_opt ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10869 0x6d445a cp_parser_translation_unit ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:4014 0x6d445a c_parse_file() ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:31536 Please submit a full bug report, [etc.] The code was correctly rejected by GCC 4.4.0 and wrongly accepted by GCC 4.4.1-4.5.3.