From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-443864-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29560 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2014 23:10:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29536 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2014 23:10:45 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/60229] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.4
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60229-4-xxJC5IR5Z1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60229-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60229-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01621.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60229

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note there is no overflow happening here at all.  In that a++ is the same as a
= a + 1 which is the same as a = (short)(((int)a) + 1) due to promotion rules
in C.