public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/60255] Deferred character length variable at (1) cannot yet be associated with unlimited polymorphic entities
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-60255-4-DMKBzOjOlq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-60255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60255

--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Consider the following simple test case:


implicit none
call sub1("test")
call sub2()

contains

  subroutine sub1(dcl)   ! accepted
    character(len=*), target :: dcl
    class(*), pointer :: ucp

    ucp => dcl

    select type (ucp)
    type is (character(len=*))
      print *,"char"
    type is (real)
      print *,"real"
    class default
      print *,"something else"
    end select

  end subroutine


  subroutine sub2   ! rejected
    character(len=:), allocatable, target :: dcl
    class(*), pointer :: ucp

    dcl = "ttt"
    ucp => dcl

    select type (ucp)
    type is (character(len=*))
      print *,"char"
    type is (real)
      print *,"real"
    class default
      print *,"something else"
    end select

  end subroutine

end


While 'sub1' is currently accepted (with unpatched trunk) and shows the right
runtime behavior, 'sub2' is rejected with the error of comment 0.

With the patch in comment 2, both cases are accepted and show the right runtime
behavior.

The only potential problem I can see is that the '_size' component of the vtab
is zero and does not reflect its actual size.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-18 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18  0:03 [Bug fortran/60255] New: " antony at cosmologist dot info
2014-02-18  2:00 ` [Bug fortran/60255] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-18  9:09 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-18 14:20 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-02-19 10:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-02-19 12:08 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-27 14:30 ` antony at cosmologist dot info
2015-01-18 22:02 ` [Bug fortran/60255] [OOP] " pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-23 10:56 ` vehre at gmx dot de
2015-03-23 12:57 ` vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-60255-4-DMKBzOjOlq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).