From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-444056-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3855 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2014 11:59:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3805 invoked by uid 48); 18 Feb 2014 11:59:46 -0000
From: "filip.roseen at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60262] New: explicit destructor call to destructor of Base accepted without using a qualified-id
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: filip.roseen at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-60262-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01813.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60262

            Bug ID: 60262
           Summary: explicit destructor call to destructor of Base
                    accepted without using a qualified-id
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: filip.roseen at gmail dot com

Created attachment 32160
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32160&action=edit
testcase.cpp

struct Base { };
struct Derived : Base { };

int main () {
  Derived * ptr = new Derived;

  ptr->~Base (); // illegal

  // ...
}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gcc (incorrectly) accepts the above, while clang and icc (among others)
correctly issues a diagnostic saying that the statement marked `// illegal` is
illformed.

Destructors are not inherited and with this the destructor of `Base` is not
found via `ptr->~Base`, as can be read about under [class.virtual]p6:

  "Even though destructors are not inherited, <snip />"

This is not to be confused with a qualified explicit destructor call such as
`ptr->Base::~Base ()`, this is correctly accepted and is legal according to
several sections in the standard, including [class.dtor]p13.