[Bug rtl-optimization/60268] [4.9 regression] ICE: in rank_for_schedule, at haifa-sched.c:2557

["abel at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 7144 bytes --]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60268

Andrey Belevantsev <abel at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |abel at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev <abel at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm out of office today, so I'll have a look properly tomorrow, but...

(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> So perhaps:
> --- gcc/haifa-sched.c	2014-02-18 08:18:53.045024428 +0100
> +++ gcc/haifa-sched.c	2014-02-19 07:58:38.191381581 +0100
> @@ -2550,7 +2550,7 @@ rank_for_schedule (const void *x, const
>  	return INSN_LUID (tmp) - INSN_LUID (tmp2);
>      }
>  
> -  if (live_range_shrinkage_p)
> +  if (live_range_shrinkage_p && sched_pressure != SCHED_PRESSURE_NONE)
>      {
>        /* Don't use SCHED_PRESSURE_MODEL -- it results in much worse
>  	 code.  */

...  the fired assert below this code means that we have turned off
sched-pressure on the new region (unexpectedly to live_range_shrinkage) and I'd
like to know how this region was added.  I guess I missed some entry point
within the new scheduler code when fixing the previous PR.

> 
> BTW, why
>       if (sched_pressure != SCHED_PRESSURE_NONE)
>         free_global_sched_pressure_data ();
> when free_global_sched_pressure_data () contains the same guard and thus
> could be called unconditionally?

Pilot error while being over cautious, I will simplify that too.
>From gcc-bugs-return-444182-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 19 09:35:21 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-444182-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29872 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2014 09:35:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29197 invoked by uid 48); 19 Feb 2014 09:35:14 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59193] Unused postfix operator temporaries
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-59193-4-JbiXgsyN6R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01939.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1097

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59193

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Max TenEyck Woodbury from comment #4)
> Since there are hundreds, if not thousands of instances of this defect in the
> GCC code and there is no urgency in correcting these defects, this bug will
> only
> get resolved slowly.  Closing it for invalid reasons does the community a
> disservice.

Are you planning to help in fixing these and other problems? If so, please
start the copyright assignment process:
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal

Then, to get your feet wet, it would be better to start with some
uncontroversial bugs like: PR25801, or PR55080, or PR57622 or PR52347.

I have a long list of easy hacks that would help a lot GCC and its users.
>From gcc-bugs-return-444181-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Feb 19 09:35:16 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-444181-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29234 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2014 09:35:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29170 invoked by uid 48); 19 Feb 2014 09:35:12 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60267] ICE in c_pp_lookup_pragma, at c-family/c-pragma.c:1232; ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12887
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to everconfirmed attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-60267-4-nEHLb6N0OB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60267-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60267-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg01938.txt.bz2
Content-length: 784

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id`267

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-02-19
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 32168
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id2168&actioníit
gcc49-pr60267-2.patch

Untested fix for the tsubst ICE.  Of course, without preprocessed testcase I
can't be sure if this patch fixed it.