public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60304] Including <atomic> disables -Wconversion-null
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-60304-4-983zh2Hpmh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-60304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60304

--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #15)
> Yes, that's what the patch I'm testing does.
> 
> IMHO we should only define it for -std=gnu++98 and not any other -std mode,
> but I'll be conservative and leave it defined for -std=c++98 as well.

Thus, the warning also needs fixing. Since the same behavior will occur if the
user directly or indirectly includes stdbool.h.

A testcase:

# 1 "false.c"
# 1 "<built-in>"
# 1 "<command-line>"
# 1 "false.c"
# 1 "sys.h" 1

# 2 "sys.h" 3
# 2 "false.c" 2
int * foo() {return 
# 2 "false.c" 3
                   false
# 2 "false.c"
                        ;}
# 1 "nonsys.h" 1
# 4 "false.c" 2
int * bar() {return false;}
>From gcc-bugs-return-464922-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Oct 24 13:23:16 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-464922-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5798 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2014 13:23:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5727 invoked by uid 48); 24 Oct 2014 13:23:07 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60304] Including <atomic> disables -Wconversion-null
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60304-4-kyuw8Z2nfL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg01943.txt.bz2
Content-length: 533

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60304

--- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #16)
> A testcase:

==> sys.h <==
#pragma GCC system_header
#if defined false
#undef false
#endif
#define false false


==> nonsys.h <==
#if defined false
#undef false
#endif
#define false false


==> false.c <==
#include "sys.h"
int * foo() {return false;}
#include "nonsys.h"
int * bar() {return false;}
>From gcc-bugs-return-464923-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Oct 24 13:34:56 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-464923-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16055 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2014 13:34:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16013 invoked by uid 48); 24 Oct 2014 13:34:52 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60304] Including <atomic> disables -Wconversion-null
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60304-4-DaMdap5XLJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60304-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg01944.txt.bz2
Content-length: 464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id`304

--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I assume that testcase is meant to be C++ (because it isn't valid C) but it's
not valid C++ either:

17.6.4.3.1 [macro.names]
"A translation unit that includes a header shall not contain any macros that
define names declared or defined in that header. Nor shall such a translation
unit define macros for names lexically identical to keywords."


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-24 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-21 15:59 [Bug preprocessor/60304] New: " bug-reports at psdtechnologies dot com
2014-02-21 18:24 ` [Bug preprocessor/60304] " harald at gigawatt dot nl
2014-10-24  9:05 ` [Bug c++/60304] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2014-10-24  9:29 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2014-10-24  9:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-24  9:44 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2014-10-24  9:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-24 11:33 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2014-10-24 12:01 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-24 12:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-24 13:19 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-24 13:23 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-10-24 13:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-24 14:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-24 16:20 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-02 15:32 ` [Bug c++/60304] Including <stdbool.h> disables -Wconversion-null in C++ 98 mode redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-02 15:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-02 16:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-02 19:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-02 19:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-05 11:13 ` harald at gigawatt dot nl
2020-09-05 12:12 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-60304-4-983zh2Hpmh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).