From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-447496-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29873 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2014 02:20:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29777 invoked by uid 48); 26 Mar 2014 02:20:32 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/60315] [4.8/4.9 Regression] template constructor switch optimization
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 02:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60315-4-y2vhDTd0vn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60315-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60315-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg02365.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60315

--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The compile time hog issue is fixed now.  We still fix the predicates for
switch statement (to get pass NOP_EXPR) since it seems very common pattern. 
Richard: I suppose we can't fold away the NOP_EXPR easily earlier?