public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jb at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/60324] Handle arbitrarily long path names
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-60324-4-hTUdstk9mu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-60324-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60324

--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Rich Townsend from comment #6)
> This change introduces a dependency on strndup -- which, alas, is absent
> from libSystem in OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard), although later releases of OS X
> include it. This isn't a problem per se, as it appears that an internal
> strndup will be built if a system one can't be found.

Indeed. This is similar to how libgfortran handles a lot of functionality
beyond basic C89 + POSIX.

> Howver, today, I've run into the problem that when I build gcc/gfortran
> (trunk) on 10.9, I can't then use the compiler on 10.6 due to the reference
> in libgfortran (and perhaps elsewhere) to the (missing) system strndup. Any
> suggestions for workarounds? Can I hack libgfortran/configure.ac to force
> the internal strndup to be used?

I think hacking configure.ac is how people doing cross-compilers etc. typically
do it, so it should work, yes. configure.ac does already have such a hard-coded
list for newlib targets, take a look at that, it ought to be relatively
straightforward to create a similar list for OSX.

Another alternative would be for you to compile gfortran on your 10.6 system,
the result should be usable on a 10.9 system as well.

The strnlen/strndup implementations provided by the target system might be
faster compared to the simple fallback implementations in libgfortran, but for
the usage in libgfortran it's unlikely to be an issue.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-15  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-60324-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-04-30 22:30 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-22  3:52 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-22 21:18 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-08 16:44 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-10 10:21 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 22:03 ` townsend at astro dot wisc.edu
2014-07-15  6:09 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-11-13 12:05 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-13 12:07 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-16  1:58 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-60324-4-hTUdstk9mu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).