From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-445553-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26302 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2014 07:43:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26271 invoked by uid 48); 6 Mar 2014 07:42:55 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/60387] The gcc compiler for the ppc architecture is not compatible with PPC ABI and DWARF standards.
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 07:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-60387-4-i4yaHMvjIH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60387-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60387-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg00159.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40521#c3

https://www.sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-10/msg00028.html



We only emit debug_frame iff eh_frame is not being emitted (so -fno-exceptions
or normal C code).  Since this is duplicated information, we don't need extra
information and have extra space.  Yes eh_frame and debug_frame for PPC use two
different numbers but that is a fact of life and you need to live with it as
the ABI is fixed for both.