* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-03-05 11:12 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 11:14 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-03-05 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 11:12 ` [Bug lto/60424] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-03-05 11:14 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-03-05 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Started to fail between r208309 and r208316.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 11:12 ` [Bug lto/60424] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 11:14 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-03-05 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-05 15:51 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-05 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Which architecture?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-05 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-05 15:51 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-03-05 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Everywhere.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-05 15:51 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-03-05 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-06 9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-05 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Isn't this the same issue as PR60427?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-05 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-06 9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-06 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-06 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-03-06
Depends on| |60427
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks related, yes. Confirmed btw.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-06 9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-06 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-06 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-06 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-06 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 6 11:19:13 2014
New Revision: 208379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-06 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/60445
PR lto/60424
PR lto/60427
Revert
2014-03-04 Paulo Matos <paulo@matos-sorge.com>
* tree-streamer.c (record_common_node): Assert we don't record
nodes with type double.
(preload_common_node): Skip type double, complex double and
double pointer since it is now frontend dependent due to
fshort-double option.
* gcc.dg/lto/pr55113_0.c: New testcase.
Removed:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr55113_0.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-streamer.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-06 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-06 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-06 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-06 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Bug 60424 depends on bug 60427, which changed state.
Bug 60427 Summary: [4.9 Regression] r208312 causes ICE and wrong code for Fortran with -flto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-06 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-06 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-06 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread