public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
@ 2014-03-05 11:11 schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-03-05 11:12 ` [Bug lto/60424] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (8 more replies)
  0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-03-05 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

            Bug ID: 60424
           Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1
                    c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0
                    -flto
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: lto
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: schwab@linux-m68k.org

$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ -O0 -flto -c -o c_lto_20110201-1_0.o
../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1_0.c 
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ c_lto_20110201-1_0.o -O0 -flto -ffast-math
-fuse-linker-plugin -o gcc-dg-lto-20110201-1-01.exe
/tmp/ccGQ0Up1.ltrans0.ltrans.o: In function `foo':
ccGQ0Up1.ltrans0.o:(.text+0x3c): undefined reference to `cabs'


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
  2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-03-05 11:12 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-03-05 11:14 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-03-05 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.9.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
  2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-03-05 11:12 ` [Bug lto/60424] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-03-05 11:14 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-03-05 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-03-05 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Started to fail between r208309 and r208316.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
  2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-03-05 11:12 ` [Bug lto/60424] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-03-05 11:14 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-03-05 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-03-05 15:51 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-05 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P1

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Which architecture?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
  2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-03-05 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-05 15:51 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2014-03-05 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2014-03-05 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Everywhere.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
  2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-03-05 15:51 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2014-03-05 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-03-06  9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-05 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Isn't this the same issue as PR60427?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
  2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-03-05 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-06  9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-03-06 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-06  9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-03-06
         Depends on|                            |60427
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks related, yes.  Confirmed btw.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
  2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-03-06  9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-06 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-03-06 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-03-06 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-06 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar  6 11:19:13 2014
New Revision: 208379

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-06  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

    PR middle-end/60445
    PR lto/60424
    PR lto/60427
    Revert
    2014-03-04  Paulo Matos  <paulo@matos-sorge.com>

        * tree-streamer.c (record_common_node): Assert we don't record
        nodes with type double.
        (preload_common_node): Skip type double, complex double and
        double pointer since it is now frontend dependent due to
        fshort-double option.

        * gcc.dg/lto/pr55113_0.c: New testcase.

Removed:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr55113_0.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/tree-streamer.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
  2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-03-06 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-06 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-03-06 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-06 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Bug 60424 depends on bug 60427, which changed state.

Bug 60427 Summary: [4.9 Regression] r208312 causes ICE and wrong code for Fortran with -flto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/60424] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link,  -O0 -flto
  2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-03-06 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-06 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-06 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-06 11:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-05 11:11 [Bug lto/60424] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 c_lto_20110201-1_0.o-c_lto_20110201-1_0.o link, -O0 -flto schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 11:12 ` [Bug lto/60424] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 11:14 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-05 15:51 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2014-03-05 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-06  9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-06 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-06 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-06 11:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).