From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29183 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2014 19:22:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29150 invoked by uid 48); 5 Mar 2014 19:22:15 -0000 From: "wojtek.golf at interia dot pl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/60431] [PATCH] [TIC6X] target description missing abssi2 insn Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: wojtek.golf at interia dot pl X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00391.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60431 --- Comment #4 from Wojciech Migda --- Ok, my bad. I'll work on the testcases so that I can make gcc emit abs when it is valid. Should this PR be rejected then?