public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/60511] New: [C++1y][N3652] Missing extended constexpr function support
@ 2014-03-12 18:53 daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
  2014-12-14  0:36 ` [Bug c++/60511] " ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
  2014-12-15 15:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com @ 2014-03-12 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60511

            Bug ID: 60511
           Summary: [C++1y][N3652] Missing extended constexpr function
                    support
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com

gcc 4.9.0 20140309 (experimental) compiled with the flags

-std=c++1y -Wall -pedantic

rejects:

//----------------------
template<class T>
struct L 
{
  T t;
  constexpr L(const T& t) : t(t) {}
  constexpr const T& value() const & { return t; }
  constexpr T& value() & { return t; }
};

template<class T>
constexpr T twice(const T& t) {
  L<T> l(t);
  l.value() *= 2;
  return l.value();
}

int main() {
  constexpr int i = twice(12);
  static_assert(i == 24, "");
}
//----------------------

<quote>
prog.cc:7:16: error: 'constexpr T& L<T>::value() const &' cannot be overloaded 
   constexpr T& value() & { return t; } 
               ^ 
prog.cc:6:22: error: with 'constexpr const T& L<T>::value() const &' 
   constexpr const T& value() const & { return t; } ^ 

prog.cc: In instantiation of 'constexpr T twice(const T&) [with T = int]': 
prog.cc:18:29: required from here 
prog.cc:13:13: error: assignment of read-only location 'l.L<T>::value<int>()' 
   l.value() *= 2; 
             ^ 
prog.cc:15:1: error: body of constexpr function 'constexpr T twice(const T&)
[with T = 
int]' not a return-statement 
 } 
 ^ 
prog.cc: In function 'int main()': 
prog.cc:18:29: error: 'constexpr T twice(const T&) [with T = int]' called in a 
constant expression 
   constexpr int i = twice(12); 
                              ^ 
prog.cc:11:13: note: 'constexpr T twice(const T&) [with T = int]' is not usable
as 
a constexpr function because: 
 constexpr T twice(const T& t) { 
             ^
</quote>

The compiler seems currently not apply the extended C++14 constexpr rules as of

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3652.html

1) constexpr makes non-static member functions automatically const member
functions

2) constexpr functions require a single return statement

3) constexpr functions reject mutable operations


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/60511] [C++1y][N3652] Missing extended constexpr function support
  2014-03-12 18:53 [Bug c++/60511] New: [C++1y][N3652] Missing extended constexpr function support daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
@ 2014-12-14  0:36 ` ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
  2014-12-15 15:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com @ 2014-12-14  0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60511

Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at redhat dot com,
                   |                            |ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
      Known to work|                            |5.0

--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> ---
The current trunk accepts the testcase (and implements C++14 relaxed
constexpr). Shouldn't this be closed?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/60511] [C++1y][N3652] Missing extended constexpr function support
  2014-03-12 18:53 [Bug c++/60511] New: [C++1y][N3652] Missing extended constexpr function support daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
  2014-12-14  0:36 ` [Bug c++/60511] " ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
@ 2014-12-15 15:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-15 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60511

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.0

--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Implemented for GCC 5.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-15 15:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-12 18:53 [Bug c++/60511] New: [C++1y][N3652] Missing extended constexpr function support daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2014-12-14  0:36 ` [Bug c++/60511] " ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2014-12-15 15:26 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).