From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16217 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2014 20:16:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16198 invoked by uid 48); 12 Mar 2014 20:16:09 -0000 From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/60512] would be useful if gcc implemented __has_feature similary to clang Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00998.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60512 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Evan Teran from comment #3) > Any unsupported feature would do. All the core features are at least partially supported, only some ABI-breaking library changes have been postponed. > A quick read of that page shows a pretty good solution. Has any word towards > implementing its recommendations been done? I don't think so. Feel free to start. Defining a bunch of macros seems like a nice and easy way to start contributing to gcc ;-)