http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > I see in the dump: > > # .MEM_4 = VDEF <.MEM_8> > D.2272 ={v} {CLOBBER}; > # VUSE <.MEM_4> > _5 = MEM[(doubleD.39 *)&D.2272]; > > which looks like something we could warn about in the middle-end. Could you elaborate? My middle-end foo is not as good as it used to be. >From gcc-bugs-return-446252-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Mar 14 04:55:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24554 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2014 04:55:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24486 invoked by uid 48); 14 Mar 2014 04:55:41 -0000 From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/58324] Bogus END-of-line error with list-directed I/O of file without trailing sequential record marker Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 04:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg01121.txt.bz2 Content-length: 351 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX324 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 32346 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id2346&actioníit A proposed patch The attached patch regression tests OK on x86-64-linux-gnu. Fixes the original test case and the reduced test case.